| MANGOI TEACHERS — AUDIT REPORT | ||||||||
| December 2025 Evaluation | Report Date: March 11, 2026 | ||||||||
| Outstanding 4.75+ | V.Satisfactory 4.50~4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50~4.49 | Needs Improvement <3.50 | ||||||||
| SCORE SUMMARY | ||||||||
| Teacher | Instr (25%) | Retent (30%) | Punct (20%) | Admin (15%) | Org (10%) | Total | Grade | |
Rate / 10 Min by Teacher
| MANGOI TEACHERS — TEACHER GRADE SUMMARY | |||||||||||||
| Teacher Grade Summary | Evaluation Period: _____________ | Date: _____________ | |||||||||||||
| No. | Teacher Name | Status | Years | Instruction (25%) | Retention (30%) | Punctuality (20%) | Admin (15%) | Contrib. (10%) | Weighted Total | Grade | Monthly Salary | Current Rate/10m | |
| EVALUATION CRITERIA GUIDE | |||||
| Mangoi Teachers Performance Evaluation — Grading & Scoring Reference | |||||
| 4-GRADE SYSTEM | |||||
| Grade | Score Range | Description | Salary Direction | ||
| Outstanding | 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Exceptional performance. Skills and contributions at the highest level. Exceeds expectations in all areas. | Priority for salary increase Rate adjustment upward | ||
| Very Satisfactory | 4.50 ~ 4.74 | High level of performance. Meets or exceeds expectations in most areas. Continuous professional development evident. | Maintain or slight increase Priority assignment considered | ||
| Satisfactory | 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Meets basic expectations. Some areas need improvement, but overall demonstrates stable performance. | Maintain current rate Development plan required | ||
| Needs Improvement | 1.00 ~ 3.49 | Below expectations in multiple areas. Clear improvement plan, ongoing coaching, and monitoring required. Contract review if not improved. | Rate adjustment under review Intensive mentoring required | ||
| DETAILED SCORING CRITERIA PER CATEGORY | |||||
| Category | Weight | 1-2 pts (Needs Improvement) | 3 pts (Satisfactory) | 4-5 pts (V.Satisf. ~ Outstand.) | |
| Instructional Excellence | 25% | Poor lesson prep, low student engagement, monotonous teaching methods, inadequate feedback | Basic lesson prep, average student engagement, standard teaching methods used | Organized lesson prep, high engagement, diverse teaching methods, excellent feedback | |
| Student Retention | 30% | Re-enrollment rate below 70% Decline vs. previous period | Re-enrollment rate 80-89% Maintained vs. previous period | Re-enrollment rate 90%+ Continuous growth or top level | |
| Reliability & Punctuality | 20% | 3+ late/absent per month Unannounced absences occur | 2-3 late/absent per month Most absences announced in advance | 1 or fewer late/absent per month Always notifies in advance, perfect punctuality | |
| Admin Diligence | 15% | Reports not submitted or frequently delayed Poor and error-prone content | Generally on-time submission Basic content with minor errors | Proactive submission, detailed and accurate Includes insights useful for student growth | |
| Organizational Contribution | 10% | Consistently refuses peak-hour classes No cooperation for substitute classes | Accepts some requests Occasional substitute class participation | Active peak-hour participation Always accepts urgent substitute classes | |
| 교사 평가 기준 안내 | |||||
| Mangoi Teachers 성과 평가 — 등급 및 점수 산정 기준 | |||||
| 4등급 평가 체계 | |||||
| 등급 | 점수 범위 | 의미 및 설명 | 급여 조정 방향 | ||
| Outstanding (탁월) | 4.75 ~ 5.00 | 모든 평가 항목에서 기대치를 초과하는 탁월한 성과. 교수 역량과 기여도가 최고 수준. | 급여 인상 우선 대상 단가(Rate) 상향 조정 | ||
| Very Satisfactory (우수) | 4.50 ~ 4.74 | 대부분의 평가 항목에서 기대치를 충족하거나 초과. 지속적인 전문성 개발이 확인됨. | 현행 유지 또는 소폭 인상 우선 배정 고려 대상 | ||
| Satisfactory (보통) | 3.50 ~ 4.49 | 기본 기대치를 충족. 일부 개선이 필요하나 전반적으로 안정적인 성과를 보임. | 현행 단가 유지 역량 개발 계획 수립 필요 | ||
| Needs Improvement (개선 필요) | 1.00 ~ 3.49 | 여러 항목에서 기대 이하의 성과. 명확한 개선 계획, 지속적 코칭 및 모니터링 필요. 미개선 시 계약 검토. | 단가 조정 검토 대상 집중 멘토링 필요 | ||
| 카테고리별 세부 채점 기준 | |||||
| 평가 항목 | 가중치 | 1~2점 (개선 필요) | 3점 (보통) | 4~5점 (우수 ~ 탁월) | |
| 수업 우수성 (Instructional Excellence) | 25% | 수업 준비 부실, 학생 참여도 저조 단조로운 교수법, 피드백 부족 | 기본적 수업 준비 평균적 학생 참여도 표준 교수법 사용 | 체계적 수업 준비, 높은 참여도 다양한 교수법 활용 우수한 피드백 제공 | |
| 학생 유지율 (Student Retention) | 30% | 재등록률 70% 미만 전 기간 대비 감소 | 재등록률 80~89% 전 기간 대비 유지 | 재등록률 90% 이상 지속적 성장 또는 최고 수준 유지 | |
| 성실성 및 시간엄수 (Reliability & Punctuality) | 20% | 월 3회 이상 지각/결석 사전 미통보 결석 발생 | 월 2~3회 지각/결석 대부분 사전 통보 | 월 1회 이하 지각/결석 항상 사전 통보, 완벽한 출석 | |
| 행정 성실도 (Admin Diligence) | 15% | 보고서 미제출 또는 잦은 지연 내용 부실, 오류 빈번 | 대체로 기한 내 제출 기본적 내용, 경미한 오류 | 선제적 제출, 상세하고 정확 학생 성장에 유용한 인사이트 포함 | |
| 조직 기여도 (Organizational Contribution) | 10% | 피크 시간대 수업 지속 거부 대체 수업 비협조 | 일부 요청 수락 간헐적 대체 수업 참여 | 피크 시간대 적극 참여 긴급 대체 수업 항상 수락 | |
| 가중 합계 계산 방법 | |||||
| 가중 합계 = (수업 우수성 × 0.25) + (학생 유지율 × 0.30) + (성실성/시간엄수 × 0.20) + (행정 성실도 × 0.15) + (조직 기여도 × 0.10) | |||||
| 예시: 수업=5, 유지율=4, 시간엄수=5, 행정=5, 기여=5 → (5×0.25)+(4×0.3)+(5×0.2)+(5×0.15)+(5×0.1) = 4.70 → Outstanding | |||||
| GABAY SA PAMANTAYAN NG PAGSUSURI NG GURO | |||||
| Mangoi Teachers Performance Evaluation — Gabay sa Grado at Pagmamarka | |||||
| SISTEMA NG 4 NA GRADO | |||||
| Grado | Saklaw ng Marka | Kahulugan at Paliwanag | Direksyon ng Sweldo | ||
| Outstanding (Natatangi) | 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Natatanging pagganap sa lahat ng kategorya. Lumalagpas sa inaasahan. Kasanayan at kontribusyon sa pinakamataas na antas. | Prayoridad sa pagtaas ng sweldo Pag-aayos ng rate pataas | ||
| Very Satisfactory (Napakasapat) | 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Mataas na antas ng pagganap. Natutugunan o nalampasan ang inaasahan sa karamihan ng kategorya. May patuloy na propesyonal na pag-unlad. | Panatilihin o bahagyang itaas Isaalang-alang para sa priority assignment | ||
| Satisfactory (Sapat) | 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Natutugunan ang mga batayang inaasahan. May ilang bahagi na kailangang pagbutihin, ngunit pangkalahatang matatag ang pagganap. | Panatilihin ang kasalukuyang rate Kailangan ng plano sa pagpapaunlad | ||
| Needs Improvement (Kailangang Pagbutihin) | 1.00 ~ 3.49 | Mababa sa inaasahan sa maraming kategorya. Kailangan ng malinaw na plano sa pagpapabuti, patuloy na coaching at monitoring. Kung hindi bumuti, susuriin ang kontrata. | Sinusuri ang pag-aayos ng rate Kailangan ng intensibong mentoring | ||
| DETALYADONG PAMANTAYAN NG PAGMAMARKA BAWAT KATEGORYA | |||||
| Kategorya | Timbang | 1~2 puntos (Kailangang Pagbutihin) | 3 puntos (Sapat) | 4~5 puntos (Napakasapat ~ Natatangi) | |
| Kahusayan sa Pagtuturo (Instructional Excellence) | 25% | Mahina ang paghahanda ng aralin, mababang partisipasyon ng mag-aaral Paulit-ulit na paraan ng pagtuturo, kakulangan sa feedback | Batayang paghahanda ng aralin Katamtamang partisipasyon ng mag-aaral Karaniwang paraan ng pagtuturo | Organisadong paghahanda, mataas na partisipasyon Iba't ibang paraan ng pagtuturo Mahusay na feedback | |
| Pagpapanatili ng Mag-aaral (Student Retention) | 30% | Re-enrollment rate na mas mababa sa 70% Bumaba kumpara sa nakaraang panahon | Re-enrollment rate 80~89% Napanatili kumpara sa nakaraang panahon | Re-enrollment rate 90% pataas Patuloy na paglago o pinakamataas na antas | |
| Pagiging Maaasahan at Pagkamaagap (Reliability & Punctuality) | 20% | 3+ beses na huli/absent bawat buwan May absent na walang abiso | 2~3 beses na huli/absent bawat buwan Karamihan may abiso nang maaga | 1 o mas kaunti na huli/absent bawat buwan Laging may abiso, perpektong attendance | |
| Kasipagan sa Admin (Admin Diligence) | 15% | Hindi naisumite ang report o madalas na late Mahina ang nilalaman, maraming pagkakamali | Karaniwang nasa oras ang pagsumite Batayang nilalaman, kaunting pagkakamali | Proactive na pagsumite, detalyado at tumpak May mga insight na kapaki-pakinabang sa pag-unlad ng mag-aaral | |
| Kontribusyon sa Organisasyon (Organizational Contribution) | 10% | Patuloy na tinatanggihan ang klase sa peak hours Hindi nakikipagtulungan sa substitute class | Tumatanggap ng ilang kahilingan Paminsan-minsang pagsali sa substitute class | Aktibong pagsali sa peak hours Laging tumatanggap ng urgent substitute class | |
| PARAAN NG PAGKALKULA NG WEIGHTED TOTAL | |||||
| Weighted Total = (Kahusayan sa Pagtuturo × 0.25) + (Pagpapanatili ng Mag-aaral × 0.30) + (Pagiging Maaasahan/Pagkamaagap × 0.20) + (Kasipagan sa Admin × 0.15) + (Kontribusyon sa Organisasyon × 0.10) | |||||
| Halimbawa: Pagtuturo=5, Pagpapanatili=4, Pagkamaagap=5, Admin=5, Kontribusyon=5 → (5×0.25)+(4×0.3)+(5×0.2)+(5×0.15)+(5×0.1) = 4.70 → Outstanding | |||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | KES NILLES | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 10 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 10174.30 | Classes / Month | 172 | Rate / 10 min | 29.58 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.65 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Demonstrates strong commitment to teaching. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Strengthen the use of varied assessment methods to monitor student progress | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | [CHAINE - FULL NAME REQUIRED] | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 11 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 10999.30 | Classes / Month | 213 | Rate / 10 min | 25.82 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Consistently performs duties effectively and supports student learning. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue enhancing innovative teaching strategies to further improve student engagement. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | RICA GAMBUTA SENAS | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 7 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 8674.30 | Classes / Month | 132 | Rate / 10 min | 32.86 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.80 | Grade | Outstanding | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Displays adequate classroom management and lesson preparation. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue improving instructional strategies to enhance student engagement. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | JOENA FAE LABIAL OPENA | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 9YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 7914.50 | Classes / Month | 141 | Rate / 10 min | 28.07 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 3 | Grade | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Demonstrates commitment to improving teaching practices. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Should show more initiative in professional development. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | JUNESSA A. RARUGAL | ID No. | Position | HEAD TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 13 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 14503 | Classes / Month | 111 | Rate / 10 min | 65.33 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Demonstrates strong leadership and consistently supports teachers in improving instructional quality. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Explore additional innovative strategies to improve teaching and learning outcomes. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | FARRAH GRACE R. TACOGDOY | ID No. | Position | HEAD TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 11 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 15800.50 | Classes / Month | 157 | Rate / 10 min | 50.32 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Describe the key strengths and accomplishments of this teacher during the evaluation period. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Describe areas that need improvement and outline the support/action plan going forward. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | MARIANE GRACE L. RAMAS | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 6 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 6550 | Classes / Month | 127 | Rate / 10 min | 25.79 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Exhibits exceptional performance in teaching and classroom management. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Maintain high performance while seeking new ways to inspire students. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | MARYBELLE JAVIEN | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 2 MONTHS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 7288 | Classes / Month | 146 | Rate / 10 min | 24.96 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.75 | Grade | Outstanding | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Maintains positive relationships with students | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Strengthen the use of varied assessment methods to monitor student progress. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | SHASIL L. MONDIGO | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 4 MONTHS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 12614 | Classes / Month | 222 | Rate / 10 min | 28.41 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student and management feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Exhibits exceptional performance in teaching and classroom management. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Maintain high performance while seeking new ways to inspire students. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | ZEEMBRILLE G. FAJARDO | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 5 MONTHS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 10267 | Classes / Month | 175 | Rate / 10 min | 29.33 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.45 | Grade | Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Demonstrates good classroom management and lesson delivery. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Refine classroom strategies to maximize learning outcomes. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | KRYSTELLINE GAMON | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 2 MONTHS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 9675 | Classes / Month | 193 | Rate / 10 min | 25.06 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.35 | Grade | Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Shows commitment to supporting student learning. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue improving lesson planning and use of varied teaching methods. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | HELEN T. FEROLINO | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 1 YEAR | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 8270 | Classes / Month | 165 | Rate / 10 min | 25.06 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 3.40 | Grade | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Maintains good rapport with students. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Develop more effective assessment and feedback practices. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | ISIDRA TIMBA JAUDIAN | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 1 YEAR | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 12193 | Classes / Month | 206 | Rate / 10 min | 29.59 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.20 | Grade | Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Delivers lessons with excellence and inspires student engagement. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Further enhance collaborative practices to support colleagues’ growth. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | ARIEL V. ASOTIGUE JR | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 1 YEAR | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 2900 | Classes / Month | 54 | Rate / 10 min | 26.85 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 3.75 | Grade | Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Demonstrates good effort in delivering lessons and supporting student learning. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Enhance classroom management and time management skills. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | XIANNE KAYE FERNANDEZ | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 1 YEAR | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 18960 | Classes / Month | 333 | Rate / 10 min | 28.47 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Exhibits exceptional performance in teaching. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue exploring innovative strategies to maintain high teaching standards. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | GERWIN ROPIO | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 2 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 8425 | Classes / Month | 148 | Rate / 10 min | 28.46 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 3.70 | Grade | Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Shows commitment to improving teaching practices. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue improving instructional strategies to enhance student engagement. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | ANA MARIE GONZALES OSIN | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 2 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 12924 | Classes / Month | 220 | Rate / 10 min | 29.37 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Shows good classroom management and effective lesson delivery. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue improving classroom strategies to maximize learning outcomes. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | CHRISTINE MAE DALING RANARA | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 2 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 13426 | Classes / Month | 235 | Rate / 10 min | 28.57 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Shows good classroom management and effective lesson delivery. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue improving classroom strategies to maximize learning outcomes. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | JINETTE ROSE CLAPANO | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 2 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 8625 | Classes / Month | 169 | Rate / 10 min | 25.52 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Shows good classroom management and effective lesson delivery. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue improving classroom strategies to maximize learning outcomes. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | CINDY ANTIVO | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 3 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 20931 | Classes / Month | 307 | Rate / 10 min | 34.09 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.70 | Grade | Very Satisfactory | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Shows outstanding commitment to student learning. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue exploring innovative strategies to maintain high teaching standards. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||
| MANGOI TEACHERS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Teacher Performance Evaluation Form | ||||||||||
| Teacher Name | JENNY RANALAN | ID No. | Position | TEACHER | ||||||
| Employment Status | FULL TIME EMPLOYEE | Years of Service | 3 YEARS | Evaluation Date | MARCH 5, 2026 | |||||
| Evaluator | Evaluation Period | December 2025 | ||||||||
| Monthly Salary | 1700 | Classes / Month | 34 | Rate / 10 min | 25 | |||||
| ▣ Evaluation Criteria & Scoring | ||||||||||
| Category | Indicator | Weight | Evaluation Criteria | 1 (Poor) | 2 (Needs Impr.) | 3 (Satisfactory) | 4 (Very Satisf.) | 5 (Outstanding) | Score | |
| Instructional Excellence (25%) | Teaching Quality | 25% | Lesson preparation, student engagement, variety of teaching methods, and feedback quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Poor lesson prep No student engagement | Occasional prep Low engagement | Basic prep Average engagement | Organized prep High engagement | Excellent prep Top engagement & feedback | ||||||
| Student Retention (30%) | Drop Rate | 30% | % of students who re-enrolled vs. previous period | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Below 70% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-94% | 95% or above | ||||||
| Reliability & Punctuality (20%) | Attendance | 20% | Tardiness, absences, advance notice given, and makeup class compliance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 5+ late/absent per month | 4-5 late/absent per month | 2-3 late/absent per month | 1 or fewer per month | Perfect attendance & punctuality | ||||||
| Admin Diligence (15%) | Feedback Report Quality | 15% | Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of student feedback reports | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Not submitted or very insufficient | Frequent delays Poor content | On-time Basic content | Timely Thorough content | Proactive Exceptional report | ||||||
| Organizational Contribution (10%) | Peak Hour Availability | 10% | Peak hour availability and willingness to cover substitute classes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Always declines when asked | Mostly declines (75%+) | Occasionally accepts (50-75%) | Usually accepts (25-50% decline) | Always accepts No refusals | ||||||
| Weighted Total Score | 4.85 | Grade | Outstanding | |||||||
| ▣ Grade Scale Reference | ||||||||||
| Outstanding | Very Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | |||||||
| Outstanding 4.75 ~ 5.00 | Very Satisfactory 4.50 ~ 4.74 | Satisfactory 3.50 ~ 4.49 | Needs Improvement 1.00 ~ 3.49 | |||||||
| ▣ Overall Comments | ||||||||||
| Strengths & Achievements | Shows outstanding commitment to student learning. | |||||||||
| Areas for Improvement | Continue exploring innovative strategies to maintain high teaching standards. | |||||||||
| Evaluator Signature: _______________ | Reviewer Signature: _______________ | Teacher Acknowledgment: _______________ | ||||||||